M. Kleen voudrait la supprssion de

M. Kleen voudrait la supprssion de tout l'article 12, parce que le 1er alinea est inconciliable avec l'article 11 et que les deux autres sont inutiles.
A la votation definitive, le 1er alinea de l'article 12, propose par M. Feraud-Giraud, est seul retabli.
La modification proposee par M. Kleen a l'ancien article 13 est adoptee sans discussion.

結果 (英語) 1:

m. Kleen wants all the supprssion Article 12, paragraph 1, because is incompatible with Article 11 and the other two are useless.
has the final vote, the first paragraph of Article 12 proposes m. feraud-giraud is only restored.
amendment proposed by m. Kleen has former Article 13 is adopted without discussion.

結果 (英語) 2:

Mr. Kleen would like the supprssion of any article 12, because paragraph 1 is incompatible with article 11 and the other two are useless.
the vote final, paragraph 1 of article 12 proposed by Mr Féraud-Giraud, is only restored.
the amendment proposed by Mr. Kleen former section 13 is adopted without discussion.

結果 (英語) 3:

MR. Kleen would like the portable. of any article 12, because the 1st subparagraph is irreconcilable with article 11 and that the other two are unnecessary.
A the final voting, the 1st paragraph of article 12, as proposed by Mr. Feraud-Giraud , is only restored.
The amendment proposed by Mr. Kleen has the former article 13 is adopted without discussion.