6. Le Conseil d’Etat relève enfin q

6. Le Conseil d’Etat relève enfin que la disposition envisagée n'est, par elle-même, contraire à aucun engagement international ou européen auquel la France est partie. Cependant, la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne pourrait être conduite à se prononcer sur la conformité au droit de l’Union des règles nationales prises en la matière (CJUE, C-135/08, Grande chambre, 2 mars 2010, Janko Rottman c/Freistaat Bayern), et la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme pourrait être amenée à contrôler les mesures individuelles d'application au regard de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales (notamment, Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, 11 octobre 2011 Genovese c/Malte n° 53124/09).

結果 (英語) 1:

6. the Council of State notes finally that the proposed provision is, by itself, contrary to any international or European commitment to which the France is party. However, the Court of justice of the European Union could be driving to pronounce on the conformity to the law of the Union taken national rules in this field (ECJ, C-135/08, Grand Chamber, March 2, 2010, Janko Rottman c v Freistaat Bayern) and the European Court of human rights could be required to control the individual implementing measures with regard to the European Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms (in particular European Court of human rights, October 11, 2011 Genovese c/Malta no. 53124/09).

結果 (英語) 2:

6. The State Council finally notes that the proposed provision is, in itself, contrary to any international or European commitment which France is a party. However, the Court of Justice of the European Union could be conducted to rule on compliance with EU law of national legislation adopted in the matter (ECJ, C-135/08, Great Room, March 2, 2010, Janko Rottman c / Freistaat Bayern) and the European Court of Human Rights may have to control the individual implementing measures under the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (including Court European Court of Human Rights, October 11 2011 c Genovese / Malta No. 53124/09).

結果 (英語) 3:

6. the state council also points out that the proposed provision was not in itself contrary to any international or european commitment to which france is a party. however, the court of justice of the european union, could be carried out to decide on the compliance of union law, national rules adopted in the field (ecj, case c-135 / 08, master bedroom, 2 march 2010janko rottman c v freistaat bayern) and the european court of human rights may be brought to the control of individual application to the european convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms (such as the european court of human rights, 11 october 2011 genovese c / malta no 53124 / 09).